top of page

(UK) No special places means students "stuck" in "alternative provision," often for years

Nov 9, 2022, Schools Week: Spielman: Special school crisis leaves primary pupils ‘languishing’ in AP

Places shortage, lengthy waits for EHC plans and no cash means some youngsters stuck in 'unsuitable' alternative provision, Ofsted says

Vulnerable primary school children are left to “languish” in “unsuitable” alternative provision (AP) because of lengthy waits for special school places and services, an Ofsted report has found.

Some AP staff told the inspectorate they felt their classrooms were being used as a “dumping ground” with some children waiting three years for specialist support.

The number of pupils aged 11 or under in APs has risen by more than a quarter, to 7,000, in the last five years.

Ofsted research, published today, found many younger children only attended AP part-time for a period of between a few weeks and months.

But chief inspector Amanda Spielman, said: “Limited access to external services, and lengthy waiting times for a special school place, mean some vulnerable children languish for years in APs that cannot provide the specialist support they need.

“And the consequences for these children may last well into their adult lives.”


The study looked at the reasons younger pupils were referred to AP and the challenges a sample of 10 primary schools and eight APs faced in supporting children with additional needs.

Our investigation found 54 per cent of special schools had more pupils on roll than the number commissioned by their council, with leaders converting cupboards and staff rooms into makeshifts classroom.

At the same time, around only 60 per cent of education, health and care plans in England are issued within the targeted 20-week timeframe, according to the latest government data.

Staff in one AP told Ofsted their provision felt like a “dumping ground” for pupils who needed a special school place. They added that such children were sometimes waiting for three years.

Meanwhile, some primary school staff said they believed the purpose of AP was to be a “stop gap”….

Most of the children in the eight APs Ofsted visited had been referred because a mainstream primary school could not “safely manage” their violent physical or verbal behaviour.

But it noted that in these cases, school staff had not been able to meet pupils’ additional needs because of “a lack of funding, training or facilities”.

This comes in spite of new government proposals to reform the SEND system relying on mainstream schools becoming more inclusive….

But the research concluded that in some cases, a lack of funding meant pupils were instead sent to APs as a “short cut to getting support”.

“In addition, pupils may be suspended or excluded, when this could have been avoided,” the report states….


While 95 per cent of pupils referred to AP are of secondary school age, Ofsted initiated its report because of the growing number of younger children entering such settings.

But the issues it identified could be set to worsen. A new survey of more than 11,000 school leaders in England from headteachers’ union NAHT shows that many are looking to make budget cuts in the face of skyrocketing energy bills and extra costs for resources and supplies.

Nearly half – 47 per cent – said they would be forced to reduce non-educational support and services for children in 2023. This included cutting back on counselling, therapy and mental health support.

Meanwhile, four in ten (44 per cent), said they would need to cut spending on additional targeted interventions for pupils requiring additional support.


bottom of page