top of page

MN: SPED spending has "risen faster than incremental state increases" 16% are SPED

Feb 5, 2019, Austin (MN) Daily Herald: OP ED Others’ opinion: Paying the bill for exploding special ed costs Of Minnesota’s 863,000 public school students, nearly 140,000 receive some special education assistance.
[16% of students are SPED] Federal and state laws say students must receive services at school for various learning disabilities, developmental delays, behavioral and emotional disorders and most forms of autism. Kids with physical, vision, hearing or speech impairments are also eligible. Providing those services can cost from hundreds to tens of thousands of dollars over and above the state per-pupil allotment. State and federal government rules mandate the services, but cover only some of that cost, leaving districts to make up the rest. That cost gap, known as a cross subsidy, is expected to be $725 million this year. Metro-area examples include White Bear Lake Area Schools, which now devote $10.3 million to kids with special needs, and Minneapolis, which spends $55.3 million annually. “Districts are taking ever-increasing amounts of money out of their general education funds to pay for special education costs,” Brad Lundell, executive director of Schools for Equity in Education, told a Star Tribune news reporter. “And that, I think, is reaching a crisis level in the state.” Lundell’s group represents 60 districts across Minnesota. For years, educators and local legislators have pointed to the federal government as the culprit, because it has never paid the 40 percent share promised in the original legislation. Currently, about 8 percent of Minnesota’s $2.2 billion in special education expenses is covered by federal dollars. And though the state’s portion has increased to about 63 percent, that still hasn’t reduced the growing costs some districts must shoulder. It’s important to continue to lobby the federal government to live up to its promise. … …Special education spending has risen faster than incremental state increases in recent years. As with the exploding costs of health care, additional funding must be accompanied by containing or reducing costs. …


bottom of page